Ceramics Books and Magazines

Macfarlane and Martin ably examine the importance of the material in making possible the historical advances that were shaped by the availability of transparent glass, and convincingly show that it was well nigh essential, and we would still all be sitting around a campfire in a cave if someone had not had the good luck to discover it.

One of his more interesting theories is that the discovery really took hold because of the demand pull for it in house windows in cooler climes, and that this is why the industrial revolution had its origin in Northern Europe, rather than the Arab world with its predilection for cooling breezes. More glass for windows means less expensive laboratory glassware and other scientific instruments. Perhaps there is something to this, but I suspect there were some other factors at work as well.

This little book is an entertaining read for those interested in thinking about the broad forces that shaped our modern world and its technology. They do, though, go a little overboard at times, and the section on myopia in the orient is positively over the top.


Glass, a necessity!   October 15, 2002
 13 out of 13 found this review helpful

When I bought the book, I was more or less expecting a history of how glass was made and the development of glass through history. I was mistaken.
It is a narrative of how glass influenced history. Without glass the Renaissance and the Age of Science could not have happened.
A fascinating and informative history of the world as influenced by glass.


Not a history, not about glass   October 12, 2002
 14 out of 19 found this review helpful

This book has no detail to offer about early glassmaking, how it affected everyday lives of rich and poor, its effects on trade and culture . . . It doesn't even say what glass is.

The authors are interested in linking glass to a few well established themes of Western Civilization courses, such as the rise of the individual and the scientific revolution. Example: Is it coincidence that the great scientific minds of the medieval period were all men of the church, which for the last few centuries had been using a lot of stained glass? (The authors acknowledge that the church monopoly on higher education may help to explain this astonishing coincidence.) The discussion seems never to get beyond a few supporting quotations, and a cavalcade of disclaimers.

For a good history of glass, we may have to wait for Henry Petroski (Evolution of Useful Things) to write one.